Conservative protesters no-show as Supreme Court weighs landmark affirmative action case

Campus Reform Reporter
Total Shares

Conservative activists were notably absent from a large rally on Wednesday in front of the Supreme Court as justices began consideration of a landmark case on the legality of affirmative action.

The protest on the steps of the highest court in the land did, however, feature around 200 students or more, all of whom appeared to be in favor of current affirmative action laws being considered in the case,  Fisher v. University of Texas.

Conservative students were noticeably absent from the demonstrations taking place in front of the Supreme Court as the justices heard opening arguments in a case that might decide the fate of affirmative action.

“I’m out here because I think diversity is important,” Daniel Ramos, a John Hopkins student told Campus Reform. “I believe that we are not at the point where race no longer matters.”

Other supporters argued that colleges should not simply judge applicants based solely on academic performance.

“I don’t think that just grades and test scores are the best way to decide who should be admitted to a college or university because there is so much more that makes a person than just that,” said Michelle Lee, a student at the University of California – San Diego.

“Diverse colleges and universities will not happen on their own,” Marcia Greenberger, Founder and Co-President of the National Women’s Law Center, told the audience in her speech.

Other speakers reflected similar views.

“Many students of color face extra obstacles to success not faced by others, and when students do well despite these obstacles, universities should be able to give them a chance to succeed,” said Wade Henderson, President of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights.

In the case before the Supreme Court, the University of Texas introduced racial preferences in admissions to ensure a racially diverse student body. Abigail Fisher, however, filed a lawsuit challenging this policy after she was denied admission to the school.

Her case directly challenges Grutter v. Bollinger, in which the high court upheld the affirmative action policy of the University of Michigan Law School.

Follow the authors of this article on twitter: @TimPDion & @oliverdarcy


Marie von Astra
@marievonastra - 57 min ago

@campusreform Final, positive proof that today's college students are subnormal, virtual retards. Is there any other way to put it? #ImDone

The Irishman
@commonpatriot - 2 hours ago

via @campusreform: Boston U encourages students to get 'frisky' with '29 Days of Stimulation': Students ... #tcot

David Provencher
@DProvencher01 - 2 hours ago

Missouri legislature considers mandatory free speech course at colleges state-wide via @campusreform

Real Midwest Liberty
@MidwestLiberty - 2 hours ago

UW students crash Regents meeting to demand psychologists via @campusreform

Jagoda Gieldon
@jagodagieldon - 3 hours ago

@campusreform Wellness & Perversion Services seems more accurate

Johnny Lawful
@ViewFromTX - 3 hours ago

Wasting money on stupid vulgarity. Boston U encour. students get 'frisky' w/ '29 Days of Stimulation' @campusreform

Anthony Gockowski
@AGockowski - 3 hours ago

“Get up close and personal, and maybe get your hands a little sticky and glittery!” via @campusreform

Tyler Kingkade
@tylerkingkade - 3 hours ago

Yale lecturer jokes she might teach preschool because "[They] don’t try to get you fired." via @campusreform