Campus Christian club found guilty of discrimination for requiring its leaders to be Christians

Campus Reform Reporter

Total Shares
This is the CRO SBAR

  • The California State University system is requiring campus club leaders to sign a nondiscriminatory agreement.
  • The agreement would mean campus groups would not be able to discriminate based on "race, religion, etc."
  • Intervarsity Christian Fellowship may lose its club status at Chico State University as it requires its leaders to be Christians.
  • A Christian club at Chico State University (CSU) may lose its status as a campus group because its requirement that its leaders be Christians violates a state anti-discrimination policy.

    The California State University system said asking leaders to sign a statement of faith violates a 2011 executive order which forbids discrimination based on "race, religion, national origin, ethnicity, color, age, gender, marital status, citizenship, sexual orientation, or disability.”

    But Greg Jao, the national field director for the Intervarsity Christian Fellowship, said the group should be an exception since its leaders’ duties are religious.

    "Our student leaders aren't like secretaries or treasurers of other organizations," Jao said in an interview with ChicoER News. "They lead Bible studies and worship, things like that."

    Liz Wheatley, a team leader for the group, told Campus Reform that the group is not guilty of discrimination because it allows anyone to be a member.

    “I think one of the things that maybe people misunderstand is that our membership is wide, wide open,” she said in an interview Thursday. “We’re very intentionally multi-denominational and multi-ethnic.”

    Wheatley added that many people involved in the group are not even Christians, but simply curious students.

    If the group loses its status as an official organization it would lose eligibility for revenue sharing — which amounts to $300 to $600 of the group’s budget — and lose the privilege of hosting meetings on campus for free.

    Groups that are not recognized as official campus organizations have to pay up to $500 per week to host meetings on campus.

    Wheatley said this cost would likely force the group to have to move many of its meetings to a church — which might stop many students from attending.

    “Students who wouldn’t feel comfortable going to a church but want to ask spiritual questions, they end up with us,” she said.

    National representatives from the Intervarsity Christian Fellowship organization have said they hope to meet with university system Chancellor Timothy White to see if an exemption can be made for religious organizations.

    Follow the author of this article on Twitter: @kctimpf


    @williamharley13 - 1 hour ago

    @campusreform It's just a project...I think it looks great..Geeze don't get hung up on little things, there are bigger things to worry about

    santiago cano jr.
    @scanojr - 1 hour ago

    @CalebBonham @campusreform every professor of the university in the United States is liberal.

    Peter Hasson
    @peterjhasson - 2 hours ago

    Cal State de-recognizes Christian group for wanting Christian leaders via @campusreform

    @factisfool - 2 hours ago

    Ridiculous. "@campusreform: Cal State de-recognizes Christian group for wanting Christian leaders:

    Antonia Okafor
    @antonia_okafor - 3 hours ago

    "We are going to destroy this!" U of O students limit free speech on campus. via @campusreform @foxnation

    Elizabeth Flickinger
    @LizFlickinger - 3 hours ago

    @campusreform @peterjhasson So, if there is a Muslim group on campus is a Christian allowed to lead that? This is stupid!

    James Lea
    @jimwlea - 3 hours ago

    Cal State de-recognizes Christian group for wanting Christian leaders via @campusreform

    Antonia Okafor
    @antonia_okafor - 3 hours ago

    Pro-life activists face opposition at U of Oregon via @campusreform

    John Nicoson
    @Fritzster - 3 hours ago

    If group can’t assure its leaders believe in Jesus Christ, what’s the use of having a group at all? @campusreform