Calling Hillary ‘Mrs. Clinton’ is sexist, say Georgetown Dems

Christian Spencer
Maryland Campus Correspondent

Total Shares

  • A recent post in the Georgetown University College Democrats' blog asserts that referring to Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton as "Mrs. Clinton" is sexist.
  • Julie Antonellis, Editor-in-Chief of The Progressive, argues that "Mrs. Clinton" is a rhetorical strategy employed by her opponents to diminish the fact that she also served as a U.S. Senator and Secretary of State.
  • A recent post in the Georgetown University College Democrats' blog asserts that referring to Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton as "Mrs. Clinton" is sexist.

    "Please Don’t Call Her 'Mrs. Clinton'" appeals Julie Antonellis, Editor-in-Chief of The Progressive, asserting that using the gender-specific honorific, as opposed to her official titles of “Secretary” or “Senator,” is one of the “rhetorical strategies her opponents employ” to diminish her.

    “Referring to Hillary as ‘Mrs. Clinton’ diminishes her accomplishments by specifically attaching her to Bill.”   

    "Some may claim that it’s too persnickety to worry about the best name to call her," Antonellis notes, "but they fail to recognize the rhetorical strategies her opponents employ by referring to her in different manners."

    Antonellis acknowledges that Mrs. Clinton’s case is somewhat unique, in that her husband’s prominence as a former president precludes reducing the reference to her last name alone, observing that “McCain” and “Rubio” are sufficient stand-ins for senators John and Marco.

    Still, she insists that “referring to Hillary as ‘Mrs. Clinton’ diminishes her accomplishments by specifically attaching her to Bill and subtly diverting attention to her famous husband and his administration,” ranting that “it makes her appear as if she retired after serving as First Lady and retreated to Arkansas to stereotypically sip sweet tea on her front porch, instead of then becoming a [U.S.] Senator and Secretary of State.”

    Antonellis states she does not believe “being labeled a wife is insulting,” nor that “political titles always precede politicians’ names.” She does, however, contend with the justification that all former politicians should be called Mr. or Mrs., saying that “this ‘rule’ is widely ignored,” and is often “selectively applied” in the case of Mrs. Clinton.

    "Next time you see someone call Hillary ‘Mrs. Clinton,’ note if what the individual says is something positive or negative about her," the self-described feminist concludes. "I think you’ll find that most of the time the individual expresses negative thoughts about her. Personally I would prefer to call her 'Madam President.'"

    Follow the author of this article on Twitter: @C_Spencer_



    Christian Spencer

    Christian Spencer

    Maryland Campus Correspondent

    Christian Spencer is a Maryland Campus Correspondent, and reports liberal bias and abuse on campus for Campus Reform. He is a journalism and economics major at the University of Maryland, College Park. He wants to write and broadcast conservative news to empower black communities, and his work has been cited by Fox News, Breitbart, The Daily Caller, and National Review.

    More By Christian Spencer

    Latest 20 Articles