Campus Reform News Search
"Wesleyan University"

No affirmative action policy?

By Kevin DeAnna, on November 15, 2010

National Review has token notice of the controversy surrounding racial preferences at Wesleyan University.  Initially, the school's admissions department denied that there was any kind of policy that discriminated against prospective students based on race.  Now, the faculty has let the cat out of the bag by writing in to the school paper to defend racial preferences.  

Mytheos Holt at Phi Beta Cons comments --

90 on 2

By Cardinal Conservatives, on November 08, 2010

Note: The Wesleyan Conservatives, of which Aileen is president, created campus controversy when they hosted an affirmative action bake sale intended to satirize affirmative action policies.

"...in response to the Affirmative Action Bake Sale sponsored by the Wesleyan Cardinal Conservatives, a group of concerned students and faculty will be hosting a forum...This forum will provide an open space for anyone interested to listen and voice their thoughts, opinions, feelings, questions, concerns, etc. about the bake sale.  In so doing, we hope to address not only what affirmative action policies are and how they pertain to Wesleyan, but also, our campus climate and deeper societal issues that acted as catalysts for this event. Other points of interest are equally open for discussion..."

Frankly, I felt attacked.

A selection of remarks: "this disrupted my life," "you don't care about the ways you hurt people," "the bake sale was self-centered and self-absorbed," "you have a really ignorant understanding of how equality works," "your opinions are based on misinformation," "you divided the university, itemized us and priced us," "you spit on a university that has brought together so many different people."

Affirmative Action Bake Sale Prompts Attacks

By Jessica McMillan, on November 03, 2010

A week ago, on October 26, Wesleyan’s Cardinal Conservatives held an affirmative action bake sale. A total assault on the group and its members has ensued.

Claire Bond Potter, Wesleyan history and American Studies professor, wrote a lengthy email to group members on October 28: "If you really want to talk about admissions policy, you should read about it...not organize public stunts that embarrass fellow students without making yourself available for an intelligent conversation about the facts."

Potter, of course, didn't attend the satirical bake sale. Nor did she attend a forum sponsored by the Cardinal Conservatives to discuss the event. Instead, she heard about the event through a colleague -- and was immediately compelled to respond.

Affirmative Action Bake Sale Heats Things Up at Wesleyan

By Jessica McMillan, on October 28, 2010

Yesterday, as Wesleyan students hurried to class they encountered what looked like a normal bake sale. Upon closer inspection it was anything but ordinary, the Cardinal Conservatives were holding their first event: an affirmative action bake sale.

The bake sale satirized affirmative action policies by charging students different prices for the baked goods based on their race. For instance: white students were charged $2.00 per item; Asian Americans, $1.50; Latinos, $1.00; African Americans, 75 cents; and Native Americans, nothing. Women received an even greater discount: items were 25 cents cheaper than listed price to compensate for “institutionalized discrimination that transcends nearly all cultures.”

Many students responded emotionally to the demonstration, with comments like “Are you serious?” or “You’ve got to be kidding!” Yes, in part the bake sale was a satire regarding the unfair practice of affirmative action that gives preferential treatment to individuals based solely on race or gender.

Myles Potters, a student at Wesleyan, expressed that although he disagreed with the Cardinal Conservative’s stance and views on affirmative action he felt that "it’s great that they are starting a dialogue which forces us to really consider the issue instead of just falling back onto the stereotypical (for Wesleyan) liberal party line."

After all, President Roth Asked for It

By Tori Rowe, on October 12, 2010

Last week, Wesleyan's President Roth publically recognized that “Wesleyan students are "known as a [single] political group" and that Wesleyan has been a place that has "marginalized conservative voices." His attention to the marginalized conservative voice is both appreciated and surprising.

In his Wesleyan blog, President Roth frequently spouts his political ideology from his disapproval of the Citizens United ruling that "deemed money to have the protections of speech" to his condemnation of intolerant conservatives.  Two years ago, he objected to students who asked that the campus be more tolerant of religion "because of the institutionalized and theologically justified intolerance that does characterize some major faith groups."

President Roth’s political opinions are quite clear, but he has issued an invitation for conservatives.  He has publically stated that political diversity is "crucial for universities."  I suggest we answer that call. 

I have spoken with too many Wesleyan students afraid to admit their criticism of the liberal agenda and even more that couldn’t accurately describe the conservative perspective on any major issue, such as the Argus columnist who dismissively addressed a handful of issues and then asked students if they too were frightened by the “anti-intellectual” conservative movement.

Battle Scars

By Victoria Rowe, on October 08, 2010

Editor's Note: This piece was written by an anonymous conservative student at Wesleyan.

Every class I feel like I have to do extra reading—just to balance out what’s been assigned.  I’m sitting here writing a paper knowing the sources I have been provided with have already determined the position I am suppose to argue.

I know students who don’t say anything, because they know they can’t challenge the whole class.  Knowing that they don’t know everything about an issue, they say nothing.  Maybe that’s what scares me most about education.

The classroom is designed to be a place for the exploration of ideas, but because an idea is not popular, it is not spoken.

For suggesting that inequality could in any way be good, because it is through inequality that airplanes were invented and medicine advanced, I was laughed at.  My peers condemned Hayek before they even read what he had to say and have attributed global warming to the writings of John Locke. My physics textbooks informs me in a single paragraph that Adam Smith was wrong and that there are no costs attached to adjustments in energy infrastructure in Germany, because the government pays for it.  My government TA asserted that Reagan had nothing to do with the fall of communism.

  • 1