Feminist prof says 'traditional science' is rooted in racism

Toni Airaksinen
New York Campus Correspondent

  • A feminist professor at the University of California-Davis has vowed to “challenge the authority of Science” by “rewriting knowledge” through a feminist lens.
  • Sara Giordano argues that "traditional science" relies on "a colonial and racialized form of power," and must be replaced with an "anti-science, antiracist, feminist approach to knowledge production.”
  • A feminist professor at the University of California-Davis has vowed to “challenge the authority of Science” by “rewriting knowledge” through a feminist lens.

    Sara Giordano, who left the field of neuroscience to become a Women’s Studies professor at UC-Davis, opened up about her feelings towards the sciences in a recent essay for Catalyst, a journal of feminist theory.

    "We need to disrupt the epistemic authority of Science…[and] the assumption that science = truth."   

    [RELATED: Prof says ‘social justice warrior’ librarians endanger science]

    Science, she worries, has “earned its epistemic authority through its co-constitution with colonization and slavery,” and therefore “relies on a colonial and racialized form of power.”

    Not only is science rooted in racism, she alleges; it has been used to perpetuate racism and colonial practices.

    “At the root of the justification for social inequality then is Western science,” she says, claiming that science’s distinction between “humans and non-humans” has allowed  “capitalism [to become] justified as a natural economic system.”

    [RELATED: Students mad that econ profs promote ‘capitalist ideologies’]

    However, Giordano is hopeful that feminists can work towards creating new approaches that don’t conflate science with truth.

    “We need to disrupt the epistemic authority of Science…[and] the assumption that science = truth,” Giordano writes, further arguing that this can be done by implementing a “feminist science practice that explicitly unsticks Science from Truth.”

    It is unclear what exactly Giordano means by separating science from truth. Although Giordano has a Ph.D. in Neuroscience from Emory University, she does not cite any examples of scientific knowledge that could benefit from a feminist intervention.

    [RELATED: Researcher dismisses science ‘conducted primarily by white men’]

    She does, however, say that she hopes her essay “opens up questions about what kinds of scientific illiteracy we might embrace to destabilize science and remake knowledge production.”

    Further, she concludes by expressing hope that people will soon come to “embrace an irreverent disdain for traditional science and instead practice feminist science,” adding that this is time for a  “much needed anti-science, antiracist, feminist approach to knowledge production.”

    Campus Reform reached out to Giordano multiple times for comment, but did not receive a response in time for publication.

    Follow the author of this article on Twitter: @Toni_Airaksinen





    Toni Airaksinen

    Toni Airaksinen

    New York Campus Correspondent

    Toni Airaksinen is a New York Campus Correspondent, and reports liberal bias and abuse on college campuses for Campus Reform. She is a junior at Barnard College, and also contributes regularly to The College Fix, USA Today College, Red Alert Politics, and Quillette Magazine. She formerly held a post with the Columbia Spectator and has been featured on Fox News and on the Drudge Report.

    More By Toni Airaksinen

    Latest 20 Articles