Students accused of 'hatred' for defending traditional marriage

  • Leaders of the Georgetown University "Pride" student group are demanding that student government cut all funding and benefits for Love Saxa, a pro-traditional marriage group.
  • Love Saxa's opponents claim that the group's is ineligible because its mission fosters "hatred and intolerance" by insisting that marriage should be "a monogamous and permanent union between a man and a woman."

LGBT students are attempting to defund Love Saxa, a Georgetown University student group that supports traditional marriage.

Love Saxa’s mission statement says the group “exists to promote healthy relationships on campus through cultivating a proper understanding of sex, gender, marriage, and family among Georgetown students.”

"They deny certain individuals who are queer access to this ideal standard of a relationship."   

The group also aims to “increase awareness of the benefits of sexual integrity, healthy dating relationships, and the primacy of marriage (understood as a monogamous and permanent union between a man and a woman) as a central pillar of society.”

[RELATED: Students 'fear' Chick-fil-A will jeopardize 'safe place']

Jasmin Ouseph submitted a formal notice to the university on September 25, on the grounds that Love Saxa’s definition of marriage fosters hatred and intolerance which would violate Georgetown’s Student Organization Standards.

“Marriage is a conjugal union on every level—emotional, spiritual, physical and mental—directed toward caring for biological children,” Irvine told The Hoya. “To us, marriage is much more than commitment of love between two consenting adults.”

The official rule states that “groups will not be eligible for access to benefits if their purpose or activities…foster hatred or intolerance of others because of their race, nationality, gender, religion, or sexual preferences.”

[RELATED: LGBTQ+ students demand special treatment from Clemson]

Another rule in the Student Organization Standards, however, says that “interfering with another group’s freedom of expression” is prohibited.

In 2013, then-GU Pride President Thomas Lloyd led protests against Love Saxa. Now the current GU Pride President, Chad Gasman, joins Ouseph in her complaint, arguing that “when they deny certain individuals who are queer access to this ideal standard of a relationship, they immediately say that all queer relationships are not as valid as heterosexual relationships.”

Love Saxa’s mission statement, conversely, asserts that “many Georgetown students lack a space to discuss their experiences of the harmful effects of a distorted view of human sexuality and the human person.”

[RELATED: LGBT-only dorms could 'backfire,' prof warns]

“We have never advocated for violence toward any individual or group, not have we ever targeted any individual or group,” Love Saxa President Amelia Irvine wrote in an email to The Hoya.

Nonetheless, Georgetown’s Student Activities Commission will conduct a hearing next Monday to decide whether or not the organization has violated Student Organization Standards.

“I have no idea what the commission is going to decide but there is a full range of options available from nothing to suspension of access to benefits,” SAC Chair Ricardo Mondolfi told The Hoya.

Follow the author of this article on Twitter: @KylePerisic

Get exclusive access to breaking CampusReform stories as they happen. Sign up below and we'll keep you in the loop.
 Weekly Digest

 Daily Emails

Kyle Perisic
Kyle Perisic | Freelance Journalist/Editor

Kyle Perisic is a freelance journalist and editor. His work as a journalist covering tech, politics and education have been featured on The Drudge Report, The Daily Caller, Campus Reform and The Daily Signal. He graduated from the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities.

20 Articles by Kyle Perisic