Profs: Offensive monuments, names cause ‘psychological harm’

Toni Airaksinen
New York Campus Correspondent

  • Three University of Tennessee professors say colleges should rename controversial monuments because of the “psychological harm” they cause to minority students.
  • The professors suggest that colleges conduct routine "landscape impact assessments" to “mitigate the psychological harm that discriminatory public spaces impose on African Americans" by renaming them after people of color.
  • Even Abraham Lincoln has been the target of recent demands to remove potentially offensive monuments from college campuses.

    Three University of Tennessee professors say colleges should rename controversial monuments because of the “psychological harm” they cause to minority students.

    In a recent academic paper, professors Jordan Brasher, Derek Alderman, and Joshua Inwood call for the development of a “responsible landscape policy” to help colleges assess monuments, statues, buildings, and dorms named after racist historical figures.

    "These commemorated individuals can serve as a ‘hidden curriculum’ that gives...clues about who belongs."   

    Campus buildings named after such figures, they argue, contribute to the tradition of “valorizing public figures with reputations for defending and perpetuating slavery, white supremacy, racial segregation, and disenfranchisement.”

    [RELATED: Poll shows Millennials are just fine with Confederate monuments]

    “These commemorated individuals can serve as a ‘hidden curriculum’ that gives sometimes subtle, but often times overt clues about who belongs and whose histories are important to the development of the university and its identity,” they argue.

    To change this, the professors call for “landscape interventions” to rename the monuments and promote a sense of “belonging” for minority students, and so establish a “more just landscape of racial identity and belonging.”

    They even have a suggestion for how to go about replacing problematic names, suggesting that colleges "can carefully select surrogate names that are not benignly colorblind but instead actively remember and honor the lives of people of color."

    [RELATED: Geraldo Rivera quits Yale over Calhoun College name change]

    Jordan Brasher, the lead author of the paper, encouraged college administrators  to implement what he and his colleagues call “landscape impact assessments” to determine the scope of racially offensive monuments on campus and consider renaming them.  

    The purpose of such an assessment, he told Campus Reform, would be to “stop the production of discriminatory public spaces,” which could “mitigate the psychological harm that discriminatory public spaces impose on African Americans and their sense of belonging.”

    [RELATED: UNC students threaten federal lawsuit over Confederate statue]

    In addition to assessing the names of campus buildings, Brasher told Campus Reform that there are other ways for schools to handle the issue, such as conducting teach-ins on the “commemoration of white supremacists on campus.”

    Professors “can draw on critical place name studies to highlight the socially constructed nature of the memorial landscape” and “engage the public with conversations” on the issue, he added.

    Follow the author of this article on Twitter: @Toni_Airaksinen





    Toni Airaksinen

    Toni Airaksinen

    New York Campus Correspondent

    Toni Airaksinen is a New York Campus Correspondent, and reports liberal bias and abuse on college campuses for Campus Reform. She is a junior at Barnard College, and also contributes regularly to The College Fix, USA Today College, Red Alert Politics, and Quillette Magazine. She formerly held a post with the Columbia Spectator and has been featured on Fox News and on the Drudge Report.

    More By Toni Airaksinen

    Latest 20 Articles