Campus Reform | Indiana U survey on ‘false election narratives’ helps Biden do his bidding

Indiana U survey on ‘false election narratives’ helps Biden do his bidding

One student at the university said that the survey is heavily skewed toward the left.

Indiana University conducted a "false election narratives" in the 2020 election survey.

Article image

An Indiana University study asked respondents if they are aware of and believe in “unsupported narratives” surrounding the 2020 election. 

One IU student was critical of the survey, pointing out how it only challenges narratives to benefit Democrats. For example, the survey pushes back against the claim the Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden is "not mentally fit to be President," but does not similarly call into question the claim that Trump is not mentally fit to be president. It also asserts that the claim that Biden's family has "illegal business ties" with China is "unsupported," but does not similarly call into question common claims from the left that Trump is compromised by Russia.

Indiana University’s Observatory on Social Media is conducting a six-part series of surveys “tracking public opinion about unsupported narratives in the 2020 Presidential election.” 

The first survey of the series was conducted from late August to early September and surveyed 597 respondents.

Researchers selected five "unsupported narratives" that they claim are “conspiracy theories” and “misleading.”

They included the following:

1. "Joe Biden is not mentally fit to be President."

2. "Kamala Harris is not a natural-born US citizen."

3. "Dr. Anthony Fauci funded a lab in Wuhan to develop the coronavirus."

4. "Joe Biden’s family has illegal business ties with China."

5. "Mail-in ballots cause election fraud."

Authors of the study claim that the statements “can be debunked with professional fact-checking.” 

To prove that the statements are false, the study cites sources such as CNN, PolitiFact, USA Today, and FactCheck.org to “debunk” the statements.

Indiana University senior Konnor Cook told Campus Reform what he thought about the statements the study proposed.

“The first ‘narrative’ is purely opinion and therefore neither false nor true,” Cook said. “The second narrative actually is false. Of the other 3, all have some level of truth AND falsehood. To say they are entirely false is misleading at best.”

He added, “The substance of the narratives aside, the sample size of this survey was 597. In a country of nearly 330 million, 597 is a rounding error. This can hardly be considered valid or representative, much less newsworthy."

The researchers showed the participants a screenshot from social media that represented one of the “trending narratives.” Then surveyors asked two questions, “Have you encountered this, or similar stories about this issue, on social media or the internet?” and “to what extent do you believe the following statement is true?”

[RELATED: Stanford pushes narrative that it's 'nearly impossible' to think outside of white supremacy]

The survey found that 78.9 percent of respondents had heard at least one of the five “narratives” stated. Meanwhile, 21.1 percent had not heard of any of them. Just over 61 percent of those surveyed believed at least one of the five statements whereas 38.9 percent did not believe any of them.

“Respondents at the extreme left of the figure rejected all the narratives; those who believed all five narratives are shown on the extreme right,” the study said.

More respondents (46.1 percent) said that they believe Joe Biden is “cognitively compromised” than those who stated they were familiar with the story (43.1 percent).  Similarly, more respondents (40.7 percent) reported that it is "likely true" or "definitely true" that Biden has “illegal ties with China” than those who said they had at least some level of exposure to the story (37 percent).

According to the survey, 54.7 percent of respondents indicated at least some level of exposure to the “narrative” of Kamala Harris’ birthplace being outside of the United States while just over one-quarter (27.7 percent) believe the story is either "probably true" or "definitely true."

[RELATED: Prof says Kamala Harris is not 'authentic' enough for Black community]

The study found that “more self-identified Republicans and Independents believed all five narratives than Democrats.”

The mail-in ballot “narrative” was the most believed, with 30.6 percent of self-identified Democrats surveyed reported that they believe the statement “mail-in ballots cause election fraud” is “likely” or “definitely” true. That's compared with 70.9 percent of Republicans and 38 percent of Independents who said the same.

More Republicans than Democrats expressed a belief in Fauci funding a Wuhan lab developing COVID-19. The study found that 34.3 percent of Republicans surveyed admitted some level of belief in the story compared with just 24.2 percent of Democrats.

“I think it’s quite clear that the narratives all lean to one side. Convincing the public that these narratives are false would be largely beneficial for the Democratic Party. In fairness, the Harris story actually is false, but the others are all up for debate. Furthermore, it throws into question the neutrality of our news media as well as our educational institutions,” Cook told Campus Reform.

Indiana University and OSoMe did not respond to Campus Reform’s request for comment.

Follow the author of this article on Twitter: @redwave1776