Prof calls Zero Dark Thirty ‘propaganda film’ for positive depiction of waterboarding
A law professor dismissed Zero Dark Thirty as propaganda in an op-ed on Friday, saying the film portrayed waterboarding in a favorable light by depicting it as a crucial tool in the hunt for Osama bin Laden.
Marjorie Cohn, a professor of law at the Thomas Jefferson School of Law argued in a Huffington Post editorial on Friday that the controversial technique of waterboarding, which some consider torture, had not in fact lead to the death of Bin Laden.
“After showing footage of the 9/11 attacks, it [the movie] moves into a graphic and lengthy depiction of torture,” she wrote, apparently referring to waterboarding. “Responding to the torture, he divulges the name of the courier who ultimately leads the CIA to Bin Laden’s location and assassination.”
“It may be good theater, but it is inaccurate and misleading,” she concluded.
Cohn’s view of the role of waterboarding in the demise of Bin Laden, however, seems to contradict a description provided by CIA Chief Leon Panetta in 2011 in which he said such enhanced interrogation was critical.
“In the intelligence business you work from a lot of sources of information,” Panetta said in an interview with NBC’s Brian Williams, following the killing of Bin Laden. “Clearly some of it came from detainees and the interrogation of detainees.”
Cohn also appeared in the column to call for the prosecution of officials in the Bush administration who ordered the use of such techniques.
“[O]bama refuses to hold the Bush officials and lawyers accountable for their law breaking,” she said.
“Armed with full and accurate information, we must engage in an honest discourse about torture and abuse, and hold those who commit those illegal acts fully accountable.”
Cohn is also the author of the book, The United States and Torture: Interrogation, Incarceration, and Abuse.
Follow the author of this article on twitter: @oliverdarcy