'Microaggression' scholars complain research used to silence speech

Anthony Gockowski
Contributing Editor/Investigative Reporter

  • The man often credited with popularizing the phrase “microaggression” is concerned that academics are abusing the term, he said in a recent interview.
  • Derald Wing Sue and co-author Christina Capodilupo say their research was never meant to provide an excuse for censoring speech.
  • The man often credited with popularizing the phrase “microaggression” is concerned that academics are abusing the term, he said in a recent interview.

    In a 2010 book, Derald Wing Sue, a psychology professor at Columbia University Teachers’ College, brought the topic of microaggressions into the mainstream with a comprehensive “tip sheet” containing examples of common aggressions—a resource that is now frequently used by professors and administrators to facilitate discussions on the issue.

    “It was never meant to give a vernacular that then makes it OK to stop talking.”   

    [RELATED: UVA student: ‘American’ identity ‘the most blatant microaggression’]

    In fact, Campus Reform has reported on several variations of the worksheet, including a recent one out of Mizzou that claimed complimenting disabled people is a microaggression.

    [RELATED: UNC claims Christmas vacations, golf outings are microaggressions]

    Now, however, Sue is concerned that universities are taking his research as an absolute, rather than the simple tool he intended it to be, saying his work is being used to punish or shame students.

    “I was concerned that people who use these examples would take them out of context and use them in a punitive rather than exemplary way,” he said in an interview with The Chronicle of Higher Education. “People who engage in microaggressions are oftentimes well-intentioned, decent individuals who aren’t aware that they are engaging in an offensive way toward someone else.”

    [RELATED: Stanford activists want to expel faculty for microaggressions]

    His colleague and co-author, Christina Capodilupo, even complained that their research is often used to suppress alternative viewpoints—a consequence they never intended.

    “It was never meant to give a vernacular that then makes it OK to stop talking,” she said. “It was to ask people to be flexible in their thinking and to be open-minded to the concept that we don’t all walk through the world in the same shoes.”

    [RELATED: Longwood students: attacking pro-choice views a microaggression]

    She and Sue are currently working on a follow-up text in an effort to clear up some of the lingering misunderstandings from their first book.

    (H/T: The College Fix)

    Follow the author of this article on Twitter: @AGockowski





    Anthony Gockowski

    Anthony Gockowski

    Contributing Editor/Investigative Reporter

    Anthony Gockowski is the Contributing Editor and an Investigative Reporter for Campus Reform. He previously worked for The Daily Caller, Intercollegiate Review, The Catholic Spirit, and The College Fix.

    More By Anthony Gockowski

    Latest 20 Articles