Drexel students demand administrators remove Jewish student groups from campus

Drexel University anti-Israel campus occupiers demanded that administrators "terminate" its chapters of both Hillel and Chabad, two Jewish student organizations.

IG: @drexel.palestine.coalition

Drexel University anti-Israel campus occupiers demanded that administrators “terminate” its chapters of both Hillel and Chabad, two Jewish student organizations.

The Drexel Palestine Coalition (DPC) set up the encampment on Saturday and made a wide-ranging list of demands to administrators, including demands to close a Starbucks, end printing services with Hewlett-Packard, end agreements with Israeli universities, and more.

[RELATED: Sonoma State University president makes boycott deal with protesters, gets put on leave]

The group also demanded that Drexel administrators terminate the university’s Hillel chapter, which it describes as a “global zionist campus organization.”

It also called on administrators to terminate Drexel Chabad, “due to welcoming an ex-IOF soldier.”

The DPC also demanded that Drexel President John Fry “publicly and explicitly condemn the Israeli settler colonial project and ongoing genocide in occupied Palestine.”

Included in the list is a demand for Drexel to divest from “partnerships with Israeli state institutions and non-Israeli entities that fund and uphold the system of apartheid, ethnic cleansing, and genocide of Palestinians.”

[RELATED: CICCIO: Sacramento State cut a deal with terrorism-loving occupiers. CBS celebrated it as ‘dialogue’.]

The group also demanded that Fry receive a pay cut of 60%, with funds being redistributed into affordable housing, partnerships with Palestinian institutions, and rebuilding of Palestinian hospitals and universities.

Drexel Hillel issued the following statement in response to the encampment:

Hillel continues to be grateful to have partners on campus who believe that a University experience should be filled with opportunities to engage thoroughly and thoughtfully around issues where there is both deep investment and deep disagreement while recognizing that a prerequisite for any such conversation is a demonstrated commitment to the safety, well-being, and shared sense of belonging of all of the students, faculty and staff who call our University home,” the group wrote.