Prof says ‘electability’ is based on gender, Warren treated unfairly

  • A professor from the University of Chicago says gender is not talked about enough in politics.
  • She claims that women get the short end of the stick when candidates are assessed for "electability."

One University of Chicago professor is slamming the idea of assessing a presidential candidate's “electability," claiming that doing so is sexist. 

Linda Zerilli, a professor of political science and gender and sexuality studies, recently asserted in an interview that a candidate’s “electability” Is heavily influenced by his or her gender. She teaches that gender in politics is a necessary conversation that has not been adequately spoken about. 

“Why does every woman who has ever gotten up there feel like she has to have a plan for everything?”   

“The main point is that gender is not being properly thematized in this election,” Zerilli told Campus Reform.

Zerilli says that the discussion of gender or race could be to female candidates' advantage but is all very secondary to their main points. 

[RELATED: EXCLUSIVE VIDEO: Cornell prof rips Elizabeth Warren's 'Medicare for all' plan to shreds]

“When the issue of electability comes up in relation to women (or a candidate of color), there is no background political discourse about the structures of domination that sustain gender inequality, including the underrepresentation of women in elected office, to make sense of this issue,” Zerelli told Campus Reform.

"Each woman candidate is left on her own to defend her 'competence,' when the real issue is the pervasive social, economic, and symbolic gender inequality that persists despite formal political equality," the professor lamented.

The professor asserted that women are held to a higher standard of explanation than their male counterparts, claiming that Bernie Sanders isn't grilled on the specifics of his healthcare plan, while female candidates like Elizabeth Warren are asked to get detailed.

“You can make the argument that she claims to have a plan for everything, but why does she feel that she has to have a plan?” said Zerilli, “Why does every woman who has ever gotten up there feel like she has to have a plan for everything?”

[RELATED: Students earn credit for 'organizing' for 'social justice']

"This year marks the centennial of the women's right to vote. Also, America has witnessed an unprecedented number of women running for top elected office. Both of these accomplishments are exciting to celebrate,” Sophie Czerniecki, President of the Network of Enlightened Women at The Catholic University of America told Campus Reform

“My friends and I in our Network of enlightened Women chapter believe that women are intelligent and thoughtful voters who are going to vote for the candidates they think are best for the job, not based on whether someone is a male or female. And that’s what we should want,” Czerniecki added.

Follow the author of this article on Twitter: @_EverettKatie

Get exclusive access to breaking CampusReform stories as they happen. Sign up below and we'll keep you in the loop.
 Weekly Digest

 Daily Emails

Katie Everett
Katie Everett | Texas Campus Correspondent

Katie Everett is a Texas Campus Correspondent, reporting on liberal bias and abuse for Campus Reform. She is a Senior at Texas A&M University, where she studies Telecommunication with a concentration in Media. She is a Member of Young Women for America and the Young Conservatives of Texas on her campus.

9 Articles by Katie Everett