Lumberjacks in Northern Arizona sure are touchy these days

  • A series of incidents at Northern Arizona University--as well as others around the country--demonstrate academia's hostility to Christianity and conservative beliefs.

I attended Northern Arizona University from 1995-1999, and earned a degree in public relations. My college memories are probably about what you would expect, particularly if you take into account that I’m a conservative Christian who doesn’t drink and didn’t join a fraternity: Frisbee, basketball, guitar, videogames, skiing, card games, Baskin Robbins, and discovery of the wonder of dial-up internet. I also visited the library on numerous occasions, but usually just to see if I could lure a friend outside to play Frisbee.

Here’s what I don’t remember from my time at NAU: being harassed for my Christian faith or conservative beliefs.

However, it seems that the land of Louie the Lumberjack — NAU’s beloved mascot — is becoming increasingly hostile to conservatives, Christians, and common sense on campus. Two recent events highlight this unfortunate reality.

First, earlier this spring, reports emerged that Cailin Jeffers, an English major at NAU, was docked on a paper for “problems with diction (word choice).” The problem: Jeffers used the word “mankind” as a synonym for “humanity.” Professor Dr. Anne Scott found this choice inappropriate and representative of a failure to “respect the need for gender-neutral language.”

Despite the fact that Merriam Webster defines “mankind” as “the human race . . . the totality of human beings,” Dr. Scott informed Jeffers that the word “mankind” is “sexist,” and urged her to “look[] beneath your assumptions and understand[] that ‘mankind’ does not mean ‘all people’ to all people.”

Thank goodness Dr. Scott didn’t have the ear of Neil Armstrong prior to his moonwalk; “That’s one small step for a human, one giant leap for humankind” just doesn’t have the same ring to it. On the other hand, Dr. Anne Scott’s suggestion that “mankind” refers only to men may be heartening to women when considering these words from John F. Kennedy: “Mankind must put an end to war before war puts an end to mankind.”

The second incident also occurred earlier this semester when Mark Holden, a history major at NAU, was accosted on multiple occasions by Professor Heather Martel. Holden alleges that Martel accused him of being a racist during a class discussion about assimilation, when Holden “suggested there are positive and negative aspects to assimilation” and “referenced a report about two Muslim men in California who reportedly said the Koran justified doing terrible things to women.”

"The college campus is a giant unsafe space for independent thinkers[.]"   

Holden says Martel told the class, “Welcome to Trump’s new America – where straight white males can say prejudicial things without being reprimanded for it” (which is ironic considering this occurred immediately after she publicly branded him as a racist).

Following this exchange, Martel sent an email to Holden, warning him of “disruptive behavior” and instructing him to “move to one of the desks along the wall by the door.” Rather than heeding Martel’s directive to move to the back of the (proverbial) bus, Holden returned to his seat at the front, where he continued his custom of reading his Bible before class.

Martel, reportedly upset that Holden was reading his Bible in front of her – even though class had not yet begun – and that he had not moved to the back, summoned department chairman (or perhaps I should say “chairperson”) Dr. Derek Heng.

After he arrived, Dr.Heng asked Holden “why do you have your Bible out anyway?”, and explained that Martel didn’t want Holden sitting in front of her with his Bible out (Incidentally, I took a New Testament class when I attended NAU — I can only imagine the outrage Martel would feel upon witnessing students reading a Bible during class).

But don’t worry, the American Association of University Professors at NAU sprang into action, apparently in response to these events.

Unfortunately, rather than condemning the suppression of religious freedom and expressing a renewed commitment to protecting academic freedom, the AAUP lamented that “NAU FACULTY ARE UNDER ATTACK!” because “[s]tudents record, report, and tweet lectures to right-wing social media” (It brings to mind the response of Planned Parenthood when undercover recordings exposed the abortion giant’s practice of selling baby parts . . . they sued the source instead of agreeing to end the barbaric behavior).

Professors Scott and Martel — and the AAUP — should be protectors of academic freedom and dialogue on campus, not active impediments to it. Professor Martel should be well aware of the benefits of such freedom, which affords her the opportunity to work on essays such as “The Gender Amazon: Indigenous Female Masculinity in Early Modern European Representations of Contact,” and to teach classes on Global Queer History and Feminist Theory. But increasingly, only one viewpoint is welcome on campus.

I spoke to a former NAU professor who said the insidious, institutionalized hostility to non-leftist ideas made it increasingly impossible to deliver an educational experience that was relevant and valuable in the “real world.”

“The college campus is a giant unsafe space for independent thinkers, whether students or faculty,” said the professor, who asked not to be identified due to fears of continued harassment. “Change is difficult because the university system is driven largely by a faculty-controlled tenure system that thrives on adherence to leftist dogma, resulting in an anti-intellectual inbreeding that is naturally opposed to academic freedom. Conformity is rewarded. Innovation is punished.

Fighting the system, even in small, mundane ways, comes at a great price,” explained the professor, who, despite success as a teacher and an academic, left the university for the private sector.

NAU is not an outlier. Recent events at BerkeleyCalifornia State University-Los AngelesGeorgia Gwinnett CollegeQueens College, and elsewhere confirm the unfortunate present reality. The suppression of free speech has gotten so bad that, absent any apparent willingness of professors, school administrators, or Congress to offer anything more than a token defense of free speech, a group of students from approximately 20 universities recently gathered at the University of Chicago, hoping to launch a movement of students to defend free speech on campus.

Only time will tell whether the sentiment will spread across the country, or be stifled by protestors and administrators who deem it antithetical to the atmosphere of “tolerance and inclusivity” they aim to foster.

The university offers an ideal setting for its students and faculty to be challenged and enriched by a variety of perspectives, as students prepare to enter a society that is composed of diverse individuals with diverse views. It’s time to restore the university to a marketplace of ideas, not orthodoxy.

If not now . . . when?

Follow this organization on Twitter: @alliancedefends

Get exclusive access to breaking CampusReform stories as they happen. Sign up below and we'll keep you in the loop.
 Weekly Digest

 Daily Emails

James Gottry
Alliance Defending Freedom | Alliance Defending Freedom

Alliance Defending Freedom is an alliance-building, non-profit legal organization that advocates for the right of people to freely live out their faith.

14 Articles by Alliance Defending Freedom

  • Unsafe Space: The glaring intolerance of Stanford activists

    What happened when two conservatives arrived at an open meeting on prison divestment to contribute their perspectives? They were thrown out, of course.

    Amy Shen Oct 20, 2017 - 3:40 PM EDT
  • How students can help advance freedom on their campuses

    The first line of defense against these violations of constitutional principles is the student body...

    Casey Mattox Oct 10, 2017 - 10:35 AM EDT
  • How does your state measure up on student free speech?

    Universities are regulating what students may say, when and where they can say it, and even who will speak for them.

    Casey Mattox Sep 15, 2017 - 2:18 PM EDT
  • UMD prez: Trump wants to 'make America white and Christian again'

    UMD’s president is doubling down on his post-election anti-Trump rhetoric, but says students should wait until Trump assumes office to protest his policies.

    Tyler Arnold Nov 21, 2016 - 2:51 PM EDT
  • Clemson admin offers recusal after students question relation to protest leader

    Several Clemson students got a hostile reception Thursday when they started asking questions about a possible conflict of interest in the school’s investigation of a racial bias incident.

    Peter Fricke and Anthony Gockowski Apr 23, 2016 - 12:00 PM EDT
  • Students react to SCOTUS gay marriage ruling

    Student advocates on the stairs of the Supreme Court responded to today’s close 5-4 decision which made same-sex marriage legal in all fifty states.

    Mariana Barillas Jun 26, 2015 - 3:58 PM EDT
  • Penn State frat suspended after cops uncover Facebook page of passed out, nude girls at parties

    One of the fraternity’s Facebook pages, called “Covert Business Operations,” had already been taken down after a female found a topless photo of herself on the page and threatened to take action. The second private page, “2.0,” was then created and remained open and active throughout the police investigation with almost 150 members.

    Kaitlyn Schallhorn Mar 19, 2015 - 12:15 PM EDT
  • University condemns 'disrespectful' glow-in-the-dark bowling fiesta, apologizes to Latinos

    “We can do better. We must do better.”

    Allison Maass Nov 12, 2014 - 12:00 PM EDT
  • VIDEO: University removes wrecking ball sculpture after students ride it naked like Miley Cyrus

    Hundreds of students protested at Michigan’s Grand Valley State University on Tuesday night after administrators removed a swinging sculpture that resembles a wrecking ball.

    Josiah Ryan Sep 18, 2013 - 9:59 AM EDT
  • UCLA student government looks to ban term ‘illegal immigrant’

    The undergraduate student government at the University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) unanimously passed a resolution Tuesday calling for the end of the use of the phrase “illegal immigrant,” saying it violates human rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.

    Katherine Timpf Sep 02, 2013 - 2:35 PM EDT
  • FL Professor Wants Communist Revolution, Says Occupy "Not Radical Enough"

    A Florida professor has been captured on film advocating for a communist revolution and lamenting that the Occupy movement is not radical enough.

    Jamil Khader, an English professor at Stetson University, told his students that communism and a stronger state are needed to thwart "predatory capitalism." In a lecture titled "Is Lenin Good for the Occupy Wall Street Movement?", Khader explained that such a revolution would not start on its own:

    "If Lenin is to be repeated--or the idea of communism as I explained it before--then the national liberation movements in the global south should retroactively be considered one of those causal nodes around which a revolutionary act is formed today...There can be no waiting for the right moment of a revolution to mature on its own and explode. But under certain conditions, it is legitimate--even advisable--to catalyze and force the revolution to come into existence."

    He went on to attack the free enterprise system, stating that the role of the post-colonial state is to protect its subjects from capitalism.

    "If you let it be like that," he said. "capitalism and corporations are simply going to extort more juice from these areas--leaving nothing basically there. The only way to roll it back is to have a stronger state...a dictatorship of the proletariat if it ever happens."

    Khader did not limit his broadsides to capitalism. He periodically took shots at conservative commentator Glenn Beck throughout the discussion, mocking Beck as "insane" and his dire warnings as "sensational rhetoric."

    This is not the first time that Khader, a Palestinian Arab, has dabbled in controversy. He is notoriously anti-Israel, and has publicly accused that republic of apartheid and genocide. When Stetson's Hillel group invited IDF troops to campus for the purpose of teaching students traditional Israeli song and dance, Khader objected--even going so far as to send a bad-tempered letter to the students involved. He has also signed off on boycotts of Israeli businesses.

    Nicolas Tomboulides Dec 03, 2012 - 3:27 PM EDT
  • UPenn offers new queer bioethics course

    The University of Pennsylvania has introduced “Queer Bioethics” as an academic discipline under the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy in the Perelman School of Medicine.

    The program was created by Lance Wahlert an associate in the Master of Bioethics Program, and Autumn Fiester, director of graduate studies in the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy.

    The two teamed up in 2010 to create a queer bioethics course and have diligently worked to expand the program.  According to the Daily Pennsylvanian (DP), the project has more than 300 scholars from 25 countries with a journal dedicated to the subject in the works.

    Wahlert and Fiester plan to integrate more “queer content” into preexisting bioethics courses at Penn.

    An example of a few of the issues listed on the website site which the project will focus on include “recognition of LGBT patient surrogates,” “blood donation standards for same-sex sexually active individuals,” “the dilemmas of gay youth studies,” and “hetero-biased sex education.”

    “The test of whether queer bioethics is sustained and whether it succeeds will not be the popping up of literal departments,” Fiester told the DP. “It will be the proliferation of deep and profound scholarship and work.”

    University of Pennsylvania administrators did not respond to requests for comment to LI’s Campus Reform.

    Source: The Daily Pennsylvanian.

    Timothy Dionisopoulos Nov 13, 2012 - 5:02 PM EDT