How does your state measure up on student free speech?

Casey Mattox
Alliance Defending Freedom

  • Universities are regulating what students may say, when and where they can say it, and even who will speak for them.
  • While the First Amendment protects free speech, universities continue to violate these core constitutional freedoms.
  • More than four decades ago, the Supreme Court made it clear that public college students do not sacrifice their constitutional rights when they arrive on campus, finding “no room for the view that … First Amendment protections should apply with less force on college campuses than in the community at large.”

    Yet the reality of most students does not reflect the promise of the “marketplace of ideas.” Universities are regulating what students may say, when and where they can say it, and even who will speak for them. Increasingly, state legislatures are responding by enacting laws to protect student free speech. We are pleased to release today a review of these state laws – highlighting the states that have protected free speech on their state-funded campuses … and those that have a lot of work to do.

    The Problem

    For decades, universities have enacted “speech codes” to regulate student expression. These policies limit what students may say and often take the form of “harassment,” “civility,” or similar policies that lump constitutionally protected speech in with true threats, harassment, and other unprotected speech. For instance, just last year, Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) successfully challenged an Iowa State policy that deemed speech “harassment” if other students thought it was not “legitimate” or “necessary” or “lacked a constructive purpose.” Despite these policies being clearly unconstitutional, they are very common.

    In addition to restricting what students may say, many universities have also strictly limited when and where students may speak – often combining these limits with requirements that administrators approve student speech or literature distribution in advance. North Carolina State required students to notify the administration five days in advance of any oral or written communication anywhere on campus until we sued and a federal court ordered the policy changed. And one school has even arrested Young Americans for Liberty members for distributing the Constitution on their campus.

    Finally, free speech is only free if students decide who speaks for them. Students regularly join together with like-minded students to advocate for any number of religious, political, or other causes, building community with one another and enriching the campus environment through their advocacy. Like all student groups, they seek to elect leaders who actually share the views that the group intends to promote. But some universities have tried to prevent religious and political student organizations from having that choice. 

    Why It Matters

    Free speech on campus affects all of us. Today’s college students are tomorrow’s legislators, judges, teachers, and voters. The lessons they are learning about how the First Amendment works will impact our future because what happens on campus will not stay on campus. Indeed, the Supreme Court has even warned that if we do not protect free speech on campus, “our civilization will stagnate and die.” As dramatic as that sounds, when two-thirds of all Americans now attend college it is only natural that our broader culture will be shaped by what we learn about the value of free speech and religious freedom in those formative years.

    How States Are Responding

    While the First Amendment protects free speech, universities continue to violate these core constitutional freedoms. The ADF Center for Academic Freedom has litigated federal lawsuits against over a dozen colleges and universities in the last year alone. And we have a 90 percent success rate in challenging these violations of students’ First Amendment rights. If you’re a student, you should know your rights, exercise them, and ensure that your campus is respecting the First Amendment.

    Appalled that their public institutions are suppressing rather than supporting free speech and association, states are increasingly enacting legislation to ensure that public universities affirm and protect those values. There are a number of model bills – all of which have their merits. But the American Legislative Exchange Council’s new “FORUM Act” would address all three of these threats to student free speech: ending speech codes, speech zones, and violations of students’ freedom of association. The legislation would also allow students to pursue legal action in state or federal court when their rights are violated.

    As state legislatures consider ways to address the threats to free speech on their tax-funded campuses, we are pleased to provide this guide to current state laws protecting the rights of free speech and association on public university campuses. It is our hope that we will have to update this information frequently as more states join the fight to defend the First Amendment on our campuses, teaching students to know their own constitutional rights and respect the constitutional rights of others.

    This article was originally published at Alliance Defending Freedom. It is republished here with permission. 

    Follow ADF on Twitter: @alliancedefends





    Casey Mattox

    Alliance Defending Freedom

    Alliance Defending Freedom
    Alliance Defending Freedom is an alliance-building, non-profit legal organization that advocates for the right of people to freely live out their faith.
    More By Alliance Defending Freedom

    10 Articles by Alliance Defending Freedom

    • Unsafe Space: The glaring intolerance of Stanford activists

      What happened when two conservatives arrived at an open meeting on prison divestment to contribute their perspectives? They were thrown out, of course.

      Amy Shen Oct 20, 2017 - 3:40 PM EDT
    • How students can help advance freedom on their campuses

      The first line of defense against these violations of constitutional principles is the student body...

      Casey Mattox Oct 10, 2017 - 10:35 AM EDT
    • Lumberjacks in Northern Arizona sure are touchy these days

      "The college campus is a giant unsafe space for independent thinkers[.]"

      James Gottry May 08, 2017 - 10:29 AM EDT
    • UMD prez: Trump wants to 'make America white and Christian again'

      UMD’s president is doubling down on his post-election anti-Trump rhetoric, but says students should wait until Trump assumes office to protest his policies.

      Tyler Arnold Nov 21, 2016 - 2:51 PM EDT
    • Students react to SCOTUS gay marriage ruling

      Student advocates on the stairs of the Supreme Court responded to today’s close 5-4 decision which made same-sex marriage legal in all fifty states.

      Mariana Barillas Jun 26, 2015 - 3:58 PM EDT
    • Penn State frat suspended after cops uncover Facebook page of passed out, nude girls at parties

      One of the fraternity’s Facebook pages, called “Covert Business Operations,” had already been taken down after a female found a topless photo of herself on the page and threatened to take action. The second private page, “2.0,” was then created and remained open and active throughout the police investigation with almost 150 members.

      Kaitlyn Schallhorn Mar 19, 2015 - 12:15 PM EDT
    • VIDEO: University removes wrecking ball sculpture after students ride it naked like Miley Cyrus

      Hundreds of students protested at Michigan’s Grand Valley State University on Tuesday night after administrators removed a swinging sculpture that resembles a wrecking ball.

      Josiah Ryan Sep 18, 2013 - 9:59 AM EDT
    • UCLA student government looks to ban term ‘illegal immigrant’

      The undergraduate student government at the University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) unanimously passed a resolution Tuesday calling for the end of the use of the phrase “illegal immigrant,” saying it violates human rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.

      Katherine Timpf Sep 02, 2013 - 2:35 PM EDT
    • FL Professor Wants Communist Revolution, Says Occupy "Not Radical Enough"



      A Florida professor has been captured on film advocating for a communist revolution and lamenting that the Occupy movement is not radical enough.

      Jamil Khader, an English professor at Stetson University, told his students that communism and a stronger state are needed to thwart "predatory capitalism." In a lecture titled "Is Lenin Good for the Occupy Wall Street Movement?", Khader explained that such a revolution would not start on its own:

      "If Lenin is to be repeated--or the idea of communism as I explained it before--then the national liberation movements in the global south should retroactively be considered one of those causal nodes around which a revolutionary act is formed today...There can be no waiting for the right moment of a revolution to mature on its own and explode. But under certain conditions, it is legitimate--even advisable--to catalyze and force the revolution to come into existence."

      He went on to attack the free enterprise system, stating that the role of the post-colonial state is to protect its subjects from capitalism.

      "If you let it be like that," he said. "capitalism and corporations are simply going to extort more juice from these areas--leaving nothing basically there. The only way to roll it back is to have a stronger state...a dictatorship of the proletariat if it ever happens."

      Khader did not limit his broadsides to capitalism. He periodically took shots at conservative commentator Glenn Beck throughout the discussion, mocking Beck as "insane" and his dire warnings as "sensational rhetoric."

      This is not the first time that Khader, a Palestinian Arab, has dabbled in controversy. He is notoriously anti-Israel, and has publicly accused that republic of apartheid and genocide. When Stetson's Hillel group invited IDF troops to campus for the purpose of teaching students traditional Israeli song and dance, Khader objected--even going so far as to send a bad-tempered letter to the students involved. He has also signed off on boycotts of Israeli businesses.

      Nicolas Tomboulides Dec 03, 2012 - 3:27 PM EDT
    • UPenn offers new queer bioethics course

      The University of Pennsylvania has introduced “Queer Bioethics” as an academic discipline under the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy in the Perelman School of Medicine.

      The program was created by Lance Wahlert an associate in the Master of Bioethics Program, and Autumn Fiester, director of graduate studies in the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy.

      The two teamed up in 2010 to create a queer bioethics course and have diligently worked to expand the program.  According to the Daily Pennsylvanian (DP), the project has more than 300 scholars from 25 countries with a journal dedicated to the subject in the works.

      Wahlert and Fiester plan to integrate more “queer content” into preexisting bioethics courses at Penn.

      An example of a few of the issues listed on the website site which the project will focus on include “recognition of LGBT patient surrogates,” “blood donation standards for same-sex sexually active individuals,” “the dilemmas of gay youth studies,” and “hetero-biased sex education.”

      “The test of whether queer bioethics is sustained and whether it succeeds will not be the popping up of literal departments,” Fiester told the DP. “It will be the proliferation of deep and profound scholarship and work.”

      University of Pennsylvania administrators did not respond to requests for comment to LI’s Campus Reform.

      Source: The Daily Pennsylvanian.

      Timothy Dionisopoulos Nov 13, 2012 - 5:02 PM EDT