UMich ignored federal guidance in dismissing Title IX complaint
- The University of Michigan did not follow proper procedure when it closed a Title IX probe investigating a professor's allegation that 11 of the school's programs exclude men.
- UMich did not notify Prof. Mark Perry of "the rationale for the result," nor did it inform him of his options for appealing the decision, both of which a government official confirmed it should have done after closing the probe.
The University of Michigan failed to follow proper procedure when it abruptly closed a Title IX probe into allegations that 11 of its educational programs exclude men.
School officials confirmed on May 22 that a Title IX investigation was underway, prompted by a complaint filed by UM-Flint Professor Mark Perry. But just three days later, on May 25—and amid much media attention—Title IX officer Pamela Heatlie closed the investigation.
“We have reviewed the programs you outlined and do not believe they violate Title IX or Prop 2 [of the Michigan Constitution],” Heatlie announced by email to Perry, according to documents reviewed by Campus Reform.
However, Heatlie did not follow federal guidelines outlining proper investigation procedure, as she did not inform Perry how the verdict was reached, and failed to notify him of any opportunities to appeal.
According to guidance released by the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR), upon closing an investigation, the Title IX officer must notify the complainant of “the rationale for the result” of the verdict, as well as “the institution’s procedures to appeal.”
While the guidance is intended for Title IX officers investigating sexual misconduct, an OCR spokesman told Campus Reform that the document “outlines the Title IX obligations generally,” adding that the guidance is “not limited” to sexual misconduct cases.
Reached by Campus Reform, a UM spokeswoman claimed that because Perry did not personally allege he was discriminated against, that the investigation was exempt from standard protocol.
However, when Campus Reform informed the spokeswoman that federal Title IX guidance still applied, according to OCR officials, the spokeswoman did not reply. Heatlie likewise did not respond to numerous inquiries sent by Campus Reform.
Unlike the probes underway at the University of Southern California and Yale University, the OCR is not yet involved in the matter, which Perry said is because he had initially hoped to give UM a “chance to respond” before filing a federal complaint.
In a prior interview with Campus Reform, Perry pointed out that UM hosts a number of programs to bolster female student success, despite their overrepresentation in the student body.
“At the University of Michigan-Flint, there are often almost two women graduating at commencement for every one male student, so there is a huge gender imbalance in favor of women,” he explained.
As a professor at UM-Flint for more than 20 years, Perry said he’s increasingly concerned about the growing “gender gap” in education, and often writes about it on his Carpe Diem blog for the American Enterprise Institute.
“There is a very troubling, inconsistent, and unfair double-standard and selective concern in higher education when it comes to gender issues, gender differences, and gender imbalances,” Perry said.
Follow the author of this article on Twitter: @Toni_Airaksinen