Republicans propose legislation penalizing public colleges that restrict free speech

  • Public colleges and universities would be at risk of losing some federal funding if the Campus Free Speech Restoration Act passes.
  • The legislation would also force private universities to be more transparent with their free speech policies.

Republican Senators introduced legislation to protect the First Amendment rights of students at public universities.

If passed, a review process would be set up within the Department of Education to determine whether speech policies at public colleges and universities infringe on students' First Amendment rights. If a school fails that process, it could lose some federal funding.

"No public institution of higher education directly or indirectly receiving financial assistance under this Act should restrict the speech of such institution’s students through improperly restrictive zones, codes, or bias reporting systems.’   

The legislation would prohibit public colleges from restricting free speech on campus, as well as require private colleges and universities to disclose their policies on free expression, and obligate private institutions to uphold those policies fairly. 

Republican Senators Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.), and Kelly Loeffler (R-Ga.) introduced the Campus Free Speech Restoration Act.

[RELATED: Emory newspaper urges school to ‘rethink’ free speech policy amid Syracuse protests]

"No public institution of higher education directly or indirectly receiving financial assistance under this Act should restrict the speech of such institution’s students through improperly restrictive zones, codes, or bias reporting systems.’’ the legislation states.

The legislation states that free speech zones "are inherently at odds" with the First Amendment.

The goal of the legislation is “to ensure that public institutions of higher education eschew policies that improperly constrain the expressive rights of students, and to ensure that private institutions of higher education are transparent about, and responsible for, their chosen speech policies," according to the legislation.

"Too many of America's public colleges have attacked the First Amendment rights of their students using so-called free speech zones and unconstitutional speech codes. This bill fights back against campus censors in order to defend open debate and free speech, which lead us to truth," Cotton said.

[RELATED: Clemson prof: Trump and ‘anyone who still calls themselves a Republican’ is racist’]

The Act also “establishes the sense of Congress that students should be free to express and hold their opinions on matters of religion and philosophy on college campuses; that free speech zones and restrictive speech codes are contrary to the First Amendment; and that public colleges should not restrict the First Amendment rights of their students.”

Follow the author of this article: Ashley Carnahan



STAY INFORMED
Get exclusive access to breaking CampusReform stories as they happen. Sign up below and we'll keep you in the loop.
 Weekly Digest

 Daily Emails

Ashley Carnahan
Ashley Carnahan | California Campus Correspondent

Ashley Carnahan is a California Campus Correspondent with Campus Reform. She is student at the University of California Berkeley, Haas School of Business, majoring in Business Administration with a minor in Russian. Ashley is also a member of Berkeley's Turning Point USA chapter.

11 Articles by Ashley Carnahan